Горный журнал Казахстана

Review on article *

The review is intended for the editorial board of the journal in order to reasonably make a judgment about the scientific value of the manuscript.

If you cannot give a review within 1 month, please inform the editor as soon as possible, indicating the reason.

Reviewer: *

I. General characteristics of the work

1. The content of the article corresponds to the profile of the journal *

Yes
No

2. The work is new, original, the results are of scientific/practical significance *

Yes
No

II. Discussion

Heading: *

GRNTI code: *

The title of the article reflects its content *

Yes
No

Annotation is informative *

Yes
No

The manuscript is well structured and written in literate language *

Yes
No

The purpose of the article is stated clearly *

Yes
No

The text uses generally accepted terms and designations *

Yes
No

The introduction of new terms and designations into the text is justified *

Yes
No

Techniques and methods are described qualitatively and correctly *

Yes
No

The math is correct *

Yes
No

You should lower the level of detail of mathematical calculations. *

Yes
No

Tables are necessary and appropriate *

Yes
No

Illustrations are useful and necessary *

Yes
No

Good quality illustrations *

Yes
No

Results and conclusions are reasonably well founded *

Yes
No

Cited works are relevant, accessible, up-to-date *

Yes
No

The list of sources used should be supplemented *

Yes
No

The list of sources used is sinful of self-citation *

Yes
No

The text of the article should be shortened/supplemented *

Yes
No

Conclusions should be shortened/supplemented/clarified/rephrased *

Yes
No

The article is of international interest *

Yes
No

The article is interesting from a regional perspective *

Yes
No

III. Evaluation of the article and comments on the manuscript (if any)

IV. Recommendations (only one item to be selected)

The article can be accepted for publication without revision
The article requires revision without re-reviewing
The article requires revision and re-review
The article cannot be accepted for publication
The article should be submitted for reviewing to another specialist

Date *

Online review

Magazine subscription

Our partners